Pages

IDC: Cloud, software options deflate sales of enterprise video systems

Saturday, 31 May 2014

Sales for this market were 'dismal' in the first quarter of 2014

Sales of video conferencing and telepresence hardware systems are declining, hurt by an increase in cloud and software-based options that often are cheaper and simpler to deploy, according to an IDC study.
In 2014's first quarter, video conferencing equipment revenue shrank 16 percent worldwide year over year to $473.5 million, while units sold fell 6.2 percent.

Market leader Cisco took a big hit. Its video equipment revenue dropped 22.4 percent. It sat at the top of this shrinking market in the first quarter with a 40.1 percent share of the revenue.
Polycom, whose revenue fell 8.4 percent, was in second place with a 29 percent share, while Huawei took the third spot with a 7.8 percent share and a 2 percent drop in revenue.
So what's behind the market's depression? Customers are delaying purchases as they look for alternatives that are less expensive, software-based and cloud-hosted, signaling a shift away from hardware-based products, according to IDC.
However, video remains a key component of enterprise collaboration stacks in many organizations.
"IDC believes that among the challenges customers are currently trying to work through are a market transition and determining exactly what, when, and how to provision their video deployments as more software-centric and cloud-based service offerings become part of the enterprise video market landscape," said IDC analyst Petr Jirovsky in the statement.
Looking at a couple of specific market segments, multi-codec immersive telepresence equipment revenue fell 33.5 percent and its units sold dropped 26 percent, while room-based video system revenue fell 10 percent and its units sold were down 1 percent.
Revenue dropped year over year in all major regions, falling 19.8 percent in Europe, Middle East and Africa, 16.4 percent in Asia-Pacific, 13.4 percent in North America and 5.1 percent in Latin America, IDC said.
A silver lining is that "most or all" of this market's vendors are responding to the shift by also offering cloud-based video alternatives, according to IDC.
For example, Cisco is looking to embed social collaboration functionality in its applications, even though it recently retired its enterprise social networking suite WebEx Social and replaced it by partnering with ESN vendor Jive Software, IDC analyst Rich Costello said via email.
He also noted that while announcing video conferencing hardware recently, Cisco introduced a cloud service for private, room-based video conferencing called Cisco Collaboration Meeting Room. "I think that Cisco is adding to its broad product portfolio in order to continue meeting evolving customer requirements -- whether premise or cloud," Costello said.
In addition to CMR, Cisco also has other cloud suites for Web meetings and video and audio conferencing like WebEx Meetings and the Cisco Hosted Collaboration Solution.
"So although hardware remains a big part of what they do, I think they envision more of a hybrid approach -- i.e. a mix of hardware and software -- as the way forward for mid-size and enterprise customers," he said.
"With Polycom, I see a similar situation as far as them being a traditional hardware vendor who has begun to offer more software- and cloud-centric solutions, and services, along with their hardware, in their UC [unified communications] portfolio," Costello added.
The study's results can also be seen as validating the software-focused and cloud-focused approach of Microsoft with its Lync UC server and, to a lesser degree in the enterprise, with Skype.
"There's certainly a lot of interest -- and growth -- in the Microsoft Lync approach to UC, as well as other cloud-based communications and collaboration offerings on the market," he said.
Read more ...

RESEARCHERS CLAIM TECHNOLOGY WORKS AGAINST STUDENTS

Saturday, 31 May 2014
Saturday, May 31, 2014
They can navigate their smart phones, update social media and retrieve info in a split second.

But cognitive neuroscientist Jacque Gamino says today's students are lacking the basic skills they need to thrive in the workforce.

"They have information at their fingertips, more information than we had growing up, but they don't know what to do with it," Gamino said.

Dr. Sandra Bond Chapman believes technology can work against students.

"We're literally building an ADHD brain by jumping back and forth through our technology, too much shifting," Chapman said.

Scientists at the Center for Brain Health have been studying a new way to help students. Instead of focusing on memorization, the "smart program" teaches kids to think critically.

In this language arts class, students learn to bounce and customize what they read. They bounce out information that's not important and customize something to make it understandable to them.

"Kids always think there's just a right answer and a wrong answer, but in life there's a bunch of answers as long as it works," said Gregory Parker, a sixth grade teacher.

The "smart program" encourages teachers to ask more questions and let the students answer them.

Also, they try to make the lessons more meaningful.

"It just, um, taught us new ways to process information and comprehend it," said Victoria, an eighth grade student.

Schools implement the smart program 45 minutes every other day for four weeks. Results show standardized test scores improve by 20 to 50 percent.

"If you know how to learn, it doesn't matter what you are learning, you can do it," Gamino said.
Read more ...

These 2 Technology Stalwarts Are Good Long-Term Investments

Saturday, 31 May 2014
kcpl

kcpl

0 followers
Cisco (CSCO) is on the turnaround trail in 2014. It is seeing revenue growth in different departments that can result in stock price appreciation in the future. The same can be said regarding Intel (INTC), which is also on a solid run of late. Let us take a close look at the performance of the two companies and see how they are positioned for the long run.
Cisco's performance
Cisco's revenue from the Data Center increased 29%. UCS continues to remain a leading platform for hybrid cloud environments, big data, and virtual desktop services gaining market share for the 17th consecutive quarter since it was introduced. Security revenue increased 10% and orders increased 20%, as a source for its integration continued to fuel growth and opportunities with customers. There are several businesses that are starting to show improving trends.
Collaboration orders increased 4%, reversing a multi-quarter negative trend while collaboration revenues decreased 12% in the quarter. The decline in Unified Communications and TelePresence was balanced by the positive revenue growth of software-as-a-service WebEx business. This quarter Cisco began unveiling its next-generation of collaboration solutions, specifically a new range of innovation cloud connected TelePresence products at very competitive price points.
Wireless revenues increased 3% with orders up 12%. There’s good strength in 802.11ac ramp, with the AP 3700 being the fastest ramping access point in its history. The emerging markets; from a macroeconomic perspective, continue to be challenging with Brazil down 27% and Russia down 28%, while China declined 8%, Mexico declined 3%, and India declined 1%.
Its strategy with emerging markets is unchanged. Its relationship begins with the engagement with the leadership of the countries on key priorities for the country and technology development initiatives and drives all the way to local municipalities, their service providers and private businesses.
Cisco’s service provider orders decreased 5%, depicting improvements from the minus 12% decline in the second quarter and 13% decline in the first quarter. The weakness in emerging markets also negatively impacts the service provider customer segment. SP Video revenue declined 26%, which had a negative impact on its SP segment numbers as it continues to manage through the transition of that business. SP Video orders declined 11%. There are some signs of stabilization in the SP business but is believed to take multiple quarters to return to growth. It continues to lead in the service provider market.
Intel's prospects
Intel has made significant progress with its Data Center Segment (DCG) with revenue up by 11% along with cloud computing, networking, and storage all grew approximately 20% for the full year. Intel had all-time record NAND revenue driven by the DCG particularly in Cloud. Intel’s McAfee also reported record first-quarter bookings along with an 8% increase in consumer bookings.
In addition, Intel has launched its Ivy Bridge MP server CPU family known as Xeon E7 that features largest memory footprint in the industry. The company has experienced tremendous response in this regard from its enterprise customers in the last reported quarter as it provides high speed and enhances real-time data analytic capabilities.
In addition, Intel has recently announced an important strategic Tie-Up with Cloudera, including investment that is specifically designed to enhance Hadoop innovation and penetration, mainly on IA. This is Intel's single largest data center technology investment in its history. The deal will join Cloudera’s leading enterprise analytic data management software powered by Apache Hadoop. This move will certainly enhance Data Center revenue in the fiscal 2014 and increase its market share in the segment.
Intel is determined and continuously working towards expanding Intel technology into the fast-growing world of interconnected devices in Internet of Things concept. The company has also acquired BASIS. Hence the acquisition of BASIS will indeed assist the company in providing access to new world-class technology and a team of proven innovators. The Internet of Things had a growth of 30% in the first-quarter 2014 and Intel is continuously driving significant innovation in this concept and further plans to invest to extend its architecture into the very low power space and acquire IP and capabilities.
Intel currently trades at trailing P/E of 14.16 and forward P/E of 13.45. Analysts have forecasted CAGR of 5.00% for the next five years. So, Intel looks like a good buy as earnings are expected to improve.
Read more ...

EC school board considers technology tools investment

Saturday, 31 May 2014
Posted: Saturday, May 31, 2014 10:30 pm
More Eau Claire students may get the opportunity to have information literally available at their fingertips.
The Eau Claire school board will discuss data collected for the district's technology plan regarding an expansion of classroom mobile devices.
District administrators recommend buying iPads for students in fifth and sixth grades this year. They also back getting Chromebooks in 2014-15 for high school English classrooms and a pilot project in seventh grade.
"We're thinking we want to share some information with the board about the level of use and the responses we're getting back from teachers and students," Superintendent Mary Ann Hardebeck said.
This year's budget includes $863,500 for iPads in fifth and sixth grades at Northstar and South middle schools. Next year's budget would earmark $363,000 for Chromebooks in the high schools and seventh grade.
DeLong Middle School sixth-graders already are outfitted with school-issued iPads, as are third- and fourth-grade classes. Those 2,250 iPads, purchased last year, cost $1.14 million.
Money already is budgeted for the iPad purchase this year if the board deems it a "solid investment," Hardebeck said, adding Monday's presentation is a status report on the technology plan.
The district would buy 1,400 iPads and 1,450 Chromebooks, said Jim Schmitt, director of technology and assessment.
He explained the district' plans to increase access to mobile devices for students and staff. "At this point we do not have a goal of one device for each student."
Both iPads and Chromebooks are tablet computers. "The iPad is more multimedia driven with a larger selection of eduction-centered apps. The Chromebook comes with a keyboard and is designed to more easily leverage the use of Google Docs. Both platforms do utilize web-based resources very well," Schmitt said.
Schmitt will report preliminary data on how the iPads have affected classrooms Monday.
"However, we have not had a learning cycle that would be represented in state testing achievement data (that will come next spring). It is also difficult to attribute a mobile device as being the sole cause of changes in student achievement," he said.
Rather, the devices are tools to maximize the effects of instructional strategies, he said.
Schmitt also will discuss this spring's student engagement survey. The information could be used by the teams at various schools as a tool for improvement planning.
In 2012-13, sixth- through 12th-graders were surveyed. This year, fifth- through 12th-graders participated.
Hearing students' perspectives on their school experiences as they progress through the grade levels is important, Hardebeck said.
Agreed Schmitt, "Looking at both years will allow (school) buildings to see the impact of their efforts over the past year."
In other action:
n The board will consider establishing a standing board committee that addresses charter schools and school choice initiatives.
n Members will vote on facility use fees for 2014-15. Rules related to the district's camps and clinics have been sent back to the High School Athletic Council for further review.
Wachter can be reached at 715-830-5828, 800-236-7077 or blythe.wachter@ecpc.com.
n The Eau Claire school board meets at 7 p.m. Monday at the district Administration Building, 500 Main St.
Hardebeck
Schmitt
Read more ...

Technology And Video Games Make Kids Think Differently About Old Questions

Saturday, 31 May 2014
Jordan Shapiro
Jordan Shapiro, Contributor
I write about edTech, game-based learning, parenting, and psychology.
TECH 
|
 
5/31/2014 @ 2:51PM |695 views

Technology And Video Games Make Kids Think Differently About Old Questions

It is popular to write about how the internet is changing the way we think. Education and parenting journalists like to speculate about what new technology is doing to our children.
People write both negative and positive versions. The negative versions complain that we are raising a generation of kids that are sucked into screens, disconnected from the corporeal world, wirelessly removed from anything that ties us to place. The positive versions celebrate the future network of connectedness, predicting a generation with an increased sense of sharing and community.
Of course, these two narratives have been around for a long time. They have nothing to do with the internet, technology, or video games. We just love to worry about our children while celebrating our progress.  These stories have accompanied just about every era, each time with language specific to the dominant technology. In essence, the narrative remains the same. It is just the primary human dilemma: we are simultaneously instinctual individualistic predators and sophisticated intelligent creatures capable of civilization.
When automobiles were still the dominant technological innovation, Freud addressed this paradox using ‘drive’ theory. In Civilization And Its Discontents he writes, “A good part of the struggles of mankind centre around the single task of finding an expedient accommodation–one, that is, that will bring happiness–between this claim of the individual and the cultural claims of the group; and one of the problems that touches the fate of humanity is whether such an accommodation can be reached by means of some particular form of civilization or whether this conflict is irreconcilable.”
Sigmund
Freud was writing about humanity in general, but his observations have specific ramifications for today’s parents. Our kids are more sophisticated than we think; they understand what’s going on in the adult world and they emulate it as they grow up. They will learn to deal with essential human conflicts in the same ways as their parents.  They will design technologies, social systems, and economic models that mirror the ways their parents choose to be in the world.
In the current world, the internet is one of the technologies we use to accommodate this conflict between individuality and community. We seek out algorithmic solutions.
For example, online retailers bombard us with targeted advertising: direct email, recommendations, and advertisements strategically inserted into our social media timelines. Living with us inside the ubiquitous temple of consumption, our children watch us satiate our desire for increasingly nuanced identity markers–the vestments and talismans of individuality–with shockingly precise personalization. Meanwhile, we’re comforted by the invisible and seemingly immortal hand of free market economics, which promises to continuously intervene in order to guarantee that our self interest also benefits culture and community. This is the new iteration of a faith-based narrative that we pass on to our children.
In fact, it is a fantastic solution to the primordial paradox that Freud so eloquently described. The internet mediates the conflict with ‘connected individualism.’ Each one of us imagines we are unique in the way we connect with others. On the web, everything public is personalized. All of the media one consumes is so well tailored to the individual that I’d have to work to see something that does not fuel my sense of self.
Many writers have observed the irony that despite the fact that we have more information available than ever before, we are exposed to much less diversity. We rarely see things we don’t want to see. Surely, we still read things we disagree with, but these things usually serve to fortify our opposing position.
What’s curious to me about the world of personalized algorithmic curation is how much faith we have in it. How many people have posted status updates expressing their confusion about the ads that appear beside their timelines? “What makes Facebook think I’m THAT kind of person?” When Pandora plays a song that we don’t like, we wonder why. We’re puzzled to discover certain categories that Netflix presumes we’ll enjoy.
It is bizarre to me that when the choice seems wrong, we still insist on an explanation, that we want to understand the logic of the predictive algorithm. I think it signifies a misplaced faith in the power of data. We doubt our own opinions, assuming automated curation must be more accurate. Does the almighty algorithm know more about one’s identity than the minuscule ego does? If there’s anything about new technology that worries me, it is that we are beginning to have more faith in quantified measures of our subjective aesthetic taste than we do in our capacity to feel and judge in the moment. This is a way of being in the world that I don’t want to pass on to my children.
Consider Minecraft. Like most kids these days, mine play it all the time. I’ve written about the good things my kids learn by playing. I love the free sandbox creativity. I think it strengthens a sense of systems thinking. But I’m also worried that so many kids develop an almost obsessive relationship to the game. They could be learning to privilege a quantified data metaphor through which to make sense of reality–one where everything is divided into blocks, pixels, and units of resources.
Dividing things into extractable monads is certainly a useful way to approach the world, but not the only one.  We know now, as we enter the post-industrial era, that adopting such an approach in isolation is ultimately unsustainable. We need to blend our capacity for ratio based thinking–ratio-nal thinking–with other modes of being. It is preferable sometimes to be emotional, introspective, spiritual, intuitive, irrationally passionate, etc.
Therefore, I spend a lot of time making sure my children don’t get too heavily absorbed in any one way of perceiving. I do this by paying enough attention to what games my kids are playing that I can ask them to switch games. That’s right, not all games are the same. Each one has unique narrative properties. Each one has particular mechanics that inadvertently teach a specific way of making meaning of the world. Gaming is not a singular way of being. Parenting gamer-kids is not just about monitoring the on/off switch.
In fact, I never limit my kids’ screen time. I do, however, require reading time, outdoor play time, and physical toy time. The difference between limiting screen time and requiring non-screen time is subtle, but substantial. It emphasizes the positive benefit of other activities rather than scolding the screen.
The screen is here to stay. We need to equip our kids with the capacity to use it as a meaningful way of mediating the essential paradoxes of the human experience. Hopefully, they do a better job of it than we currently do.
Read more ...